HomeUploadUpload DirectHotlinkRandomAbouttheme toggle

EVERYTHING | Award Winning Short Film | Official Trailer (2016)

Views:895
@IJvids

Every year, nearly 3,000 Americans die because they cannot find a matching bone marrow donor. Common sense suggests that offering modest incentives to attract more bone marrow donors would be worth pursuing, but federal law made that a felony punishable by up to five years in prison.

That is why in 2009, adults with deadly blood diseases, the parents of sick children, a California nonprofit and a world-renowned medical doctor who specializes in bone marrow research joined with the Institute for Justice to launch a legal fight against the U.S. Attorney General to put an end to a ban on offering compensation for bone marrow donors.

The National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA) of 1984 treats compensation for marrow donors as though it were black-market organ sales. Under NOTA, giving a college student a scholarship or a new homeowner a mortgage payment for donating marrow would land everyone—doctors, nurses, donors and patients—in federal prison for up to five years.

NOTA’s criminal ban violated equal protection because it arbitrarily treats renewable bone marrow like nonrenewable solid organs instead of like other renewable or inexhaustible cells—such as blood—for which compensated donation is legal. That makes no sense because bone marrow, unlike organs such as kidneys, replenishes itself in just a few weeks after it is donated, leaving the donor whole once again.

In 2011, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the cancer patients and their attorneys from the Institute for Justice, holding that the National Organ Transplant Act’s ban on donor compensation does not apply to the most common method for donating marrow. The U.S. Attorney General sought to have that ruling overturned by the full 9th Circuit, but was unsuccessful.

The Institute for Justice’s legal victory became final in June 2012, and a new tool in the fight against deadly diseases became available, when the Attorney General declined to appeal its loss to the U.S. Supreme Court.

But no sooner was that legal victory established than the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services proposed a new rule that would negate the legal victory and block model research programs designed to examine the effectiveness of compensation. Nearly 500 people—including Nobel Laureates—wrote to HHS discouraging them from adopting the rule. But for nearly 3 years now, HHS has remained silent blocking such research and costing American cancer patients their lives.

http://everything.movie
Donate to IJ: https://ij.org/support/give-now/

ij
,
institute for justice
,
freedom
,
liberty
,
individual rights
,
constitution
,
constitutional law
,
unconstitutional law
,
con law
,
constitutional litigation
Thumbnail for Eck v. Battle Press Conference10:27
Eck v. Battle Press Conference
IJvids
844 views
Thumbnail for How California Will Legalize Pot in 2016: Learning The Lessons of Prop 197:18
How California Will Legalize Pot in 2016: Learning The Lessons of Prop 19
ReasonVids
842 views
Thumbnail for The Real Miyagi's Dojo Threatened: Santa Ana Favors Foliage over Small Businesses5:29
The Real Miyagi's Dojo Threatened: Santa Ana Favors Foliage over Small Businesses
ReasonVids
859 views
Thumbnail for The Case for Pardoning Edward Snowden8:07
The Case for Pardoning Edward Snowden
ReasonVids
869 views
Thumbnail for Reason.tv at Slamdance: Drug War, Colombia-Style5:18
Reason.tv at Slamdance: Drug War, Colombia-Style
ReasonVids
931 views
Thumbnail for ABC-TV:  Minn. Farmers Fight for Free Trade2:16
ABC-TV: Minn. Farmers Fight for Free Trade
IJvids
1030 views
Thumbnail for Interview with Genesis, Natural Law, Freedom1:57:15
Interview with Genesis, Natural Law, Freedom
AmericanRenaissance
649 views
Thumbnail for What is an engaged judge?  What are the limits of precedent?1:11
What is an engaged judge? What are the limits of precedent?
IJvids
815 views
Thumbnail for The Future of Libertarian Politics9:55
The Future of Libertarian Politics
ReasonVids
862 views
Thumbnail for "Is this serving me?"8:58
"Is this serving me?"
bestofupgoat
111 views
Thumbnail for offensive memes that if ylyl v26 | pie memes11:04
offensive memes that if ylyl v26 | pie memes
invidious
170 views
Thumbnail for There's no black in the rainbow0:13
There's no black in the rainbow
bestofvid8
529 views
Thumbnail for Thor found the synagogue0:13
Thor found the synagogue
bestofvoatxyz
531 views
Thumbnail for A Very Different View Of HIV From Its Discoverer.3:59
A Very Different View Of HIV From Its Discoverer.
AOU
1301 views
Thumbnail for Brian Doherty on Ron Paul's Revolution3:29
Brian Doherty on Ron Paul's Revolution
ReasonVids
976 views
Thumbnail for Richard Riordan on Unions and Dysfunctional LA (Extended Interview)40:42
Richard Riordan on Unions and Dysfunctional LA (Extended Interview)
ReasonVids
911 views
Thumbnail for Make the Plastic Bag as Heavy as Possible | Full Task | Taskmaster | Taskmaster10:08
Make the Plastic Bag as Heavy as Possible | Full Task | Taskmaster | Taskmaster
invidious
371 views
Thumbnail for Clark Neily: H.B. 3637 Would Keep Horse Teeth Floating Legal in Texas & Protect Horse Owners3:51
Clark Neily: H.B. 3637 Would Keep Horse Teeth Floating Legal in Texas & Protect Horse Owners
IJvids
1013 views

points

Permalink
Reply
ij
,
institute for justice
,
freedom
,
liberty
,
individual rights
,
constitution
,
constitutional law
,
unconstitutional law
,
con law
,
constitutional litigation
TOS  •  Add Keywords  •  Donate  •   Analytics  •   DMCA  •   Puzzle